Hold on, you're about to get "adjusted." |
Ten days ago, the federal government released a huge data set detailing how it spent $77 billion in Medicare funds in 2012 to over 880,000 health care providers. The release of this data is part of a new transparency effort by the government, which many of us applaud.
The data reveal some troubling things.
Most news organizations focused on who the biggest beneficiaries are: the New York Times described how just 100 doctors received $610 million. A Washington Post story focused on the top 10 Medicare billers, including one ophthalmologist in Florida who was paid $20 million by Medicare, mostly to cover Lucentis, a drug for macular degeneration. The Post pointed out that Medicare would have saved over $10 million if that doctor used Avastin, which is equally effective. “Medicare pays a doctor more for injecting the more expensive drug,” the Post pointed out.
But until now, no one has pointed out another, far more egregious waste revealed by the Medicare data: we are spending a huge amount of money on the highly dubious practice known as chiropractic.
To be precise, the 2012 Medicare data reveals that in 2012, Medicare paid $496 million for chiropractic.
This is a stunning amount. It dwarfs the funding that NIH wastes on alternative medicine through NCCAM, which is itself an egregious waste of money.
Chiropractors are not medical doctors. They primarily treat back pain, but they claim to treat a wide range of other conditions, which some of them believe are related to mis-alignments of the spine, called subluxations. This belief has no scientific basis. Nevertheless, chiropractors have succeeded in convincing the government to cover their treatments through Medicare.
Now we know how successful they have been: half a billion dollars a year spent “adjusting” the spines of patients, all funded by Medicare.
(And they have recently been lobbying furiously, as I wrote last summer, to force private health care providers to cover chiropractic and other alternative practices under Obamacare.)
But wait, you might ask, don’t chiropractors provide pain relief? And don’t they have medical degrees? Well, on the second question, the answer is that they have special Doctor of Chiropractic (D.C.) degrees, which are given out by just 15 special chiropractic colleges in the U.S. The entire field was invented out of thin air by D.D. Palmer in 1895, and later popularized by his son. In his book-length expose Chiropractic Abuse: An Insider's Lament, chiropractor Preston Long lists "20 things most chiropractors won't tell you," including
- "Chiropractic theory and practice are not based on ... knowledge related to health, disease, and health care.
- Many chiropractors promise too much.
- Our education is vastly inferior to that of medical doctors."
These are just the first three: you can see the full list in a review of Long's book by physician Harriet Hall, or read the book itself.
Sam Homola, a retired chiropractor, summarized his concerns about chiropractic in an article at Science-Based Medicine. Homola concluded that
“There is no credible evidence to support the use of spinal manipulation for anything other than uncomplicated mechanical-type back pain and … no evidence at all to support chiropractic subluxation theory.”
Perhaps most alarming, especially given that Medicare is paying for millions of treatments per year, is that chiropractic manipulation can cause a stroke, by causing a tear in a major artery running through the neck. As reported recently in the Journal of Neurosurgery:
“Chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine can produce dissections ... of the vertebral and carotid arteries. These injuries can be severe, requiring endovascular stenting and cranial surgery. In this patient series, a significant percentage (31%, 4/13) of patients were left permanently disabled or died as a result of their arterial injuries.” [Albuquerque et al., J. Neurosurg 2011 115(6):1197-1205]
If this weren’t enough to cause concern, many chiropractors are also anti-vaccine, a problem that is apparently serious enough that some chiropractors themselves have spoken out against the anti-vaxxers in their own ranks.
Over a century ago, D.D. Palmer believed, mistakenly, that he cured a man’s deafness by manipulating his neck. His son built Palmer’s beliefs into a profitable business, but neither of them would have dreamed that the U.S. government would one day spend half a billion dollars per year on chiropractic manipulations.
If we want to start controlling the cost of Medicare, here’s an easy first step: stop covering chiropractic. We will save $496 million a year, and people’s health will improve.
You appear to be an educated man, and I am thoroughly disappointed that the majority of your comments and quotes about chiropractic are taken out of context or are completely incorrect. Please educate yourself before writing an educational public article that is saturated with inaccurate information. There are numerous scientifically based articles, you can find them on PubMed, that provide and describe the neurological and physiological benefits of a chiropractic adjustment.
ReplyDeleteAgain, please educate yourself before providing false information to the public based on your opinion.
The author is already very well educated, thank you. Please be specific as to what he has states that is "inaccurate".
DeleteI would refer anyone who is interested in what PubMed studies really show about chiropractic to take a look at that topic at
sciencebasedmedicine.org